ktevis1990 / Kyle

There are no people in ktevis1990’s collective.

Huffduffed (637)

  1. Supreme Court Oral Argument - Poland v. Arizona - February 24, 1986

    Question: The question presented is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a further capital sentencing proceeding when, on appeal from a sentence of death, the reviewing court finds the evidence insufficient to support the only aggravating factor on which the sentencing judge relied, but does not find the evidence insufficient to support the death penalty.

    —Huffduffed by ktevis1990

  2. Supreme Court Oral Argument - Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - April 28, 2004

    Question: Did the government violate Hamdi's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by holding him indefinitely, without access to an attorney, based solely on an Executive Branch declaration that he was an "enemy combatant" who fought against the United States? Does the separation of powers doctrine require federal courts to defer to Executive Branch determinations that an American citizen is an "enemy combatant"?

    —Huffduffed by ktevis1990

  3. Supreme Court Oral Argument - McConnell v. Federal Election Commission - September 08, 2003 (Part 2)

    Question: Does the "soft money" ban of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 exceed Congress's authority to regulate elections under Article 1, Section 4 of the United States Constitution and/or violate the First Amendment's protection of the freedom to speak?

    Do regulations of the source, content, or timing of political advertising in the Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 violate the First Amendment's free speech clause?

    —Huffduffed by ktevis1990

  4. Supreme Court Oral Argument - McConnell v. Federal Election Commission - September 08, 2003 (Part 1)

    Question: Does the "soft money" ban of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 exceed Congress's authority to regulate elections under Article 1, Section 4 of the United States Constitution and/or violate the First Amendment's protection of the freedom to speak?

    Do regulations of the source, content, or timing of political advertising in the Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 violate the First Amendment's free speech clause?

    —Huffduffed by ktevis1990

Page 1 of 64Older