Question: The question presented is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a further capital sentencing proceeding when, on appeal from a sentence of death, the reviewing court finds the evidence insufficient to support the only aggravating factor on which the sentencing judge relied, but does not find the evidence insufficient to support the death penalty.
ktevis1990 / Kyle
There are no people in ktevis1990’s collective.
Huffduffed (637)
-
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - Gonzalez v. Google LLC - February 23, 2023
Question: Does Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act immunize interactive computer services when they make targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - United States v. Booker - October 04, 2004
Question: 1.) Does an enhanced sentence under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines based on the judge's determination of a fact violate the Sixth Amendment? 2.) If so, are the Sentencing Guidelines altogether unconstitutional?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - April 28, 2004
Question: Did the government violate Hamdi's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by holding him indefinitely, without access to an attorney, based solely on an Executive Branch declaration that he was an "enemy combatant" who fought against the United States? Does the separation of powers doctrine require federal courts to defer to Executive Branch determinations that an American citizen is an "enemy combatant"?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - McConnell v. Federal Election Commission - September 08, 2003 (Part 2)
Question: Does the "soft money" ban of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 exceed Congress's authority to regulate elections under Article 1, Section 4 of the United States Constitution and/or violate the First Amendment's protection of the freedom to speak?
Do regulations of the source, content, or timing of political advertising in the Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 violate the First Amendment's free speech clause?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - McConnell v. Federal Election Commission - September 08, 2003 (Part 1)
Question: Does the "soft money" ban of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 exceed Congress's authority to regulate elections under Article 1, Section 4 of the United States Constitution and/or violate the First Amendment's protection of the freedom to speak?
Do regulations of the source, content, or timing of political advertising in the Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 violate the First Amendment's free speech clause?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - Rumsfeld v. Padilla - April 28, 2004
Question: Does Congress's "Authorization for use of Military Force" authorize the President to detain a United States citizen based on a determination that he is an enemy combatant, or is that power precluded by the Non-Detention Act?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - Tennessee v. Lane - January 13, 2004
Question: Did the Americans with Disabilities Act violate the sovereign immunity doctrine of the 11th Amendment when, based on Congress's 14th Amendment enforcement powers of the Due Process clause, it allowed individuals to sue states for denying them services based on their disabilities?
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument - Chavez v. Martinez - December 04, 2002
Question: Are a suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and his Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process right to be free from coercive questioning violated when he was subjected to coercive questioning while in police custody, even if his coerced statements were never used against him in a criminal case?
-
Ep. 203: “Killing Me to Death” - Roderick on the Line - Merlin Mann
Merlin Mann's frank & candid weekly phone call with John Roderick of The Long Winters
http://www.merlinmann.com/roderick/ep-203-killing-me-to-death.html
Page 1 of 64Older