DISCUSSION | Alenka Zupančič: Objective Humour; Robert Pfaller: The Laughing, the Loving, and the Low Thing; chair: Gregor Moder

Possibly related…

  1. ‘Dramaturgy of the Dialectic’ by Rebecca Comay | Concept/s: Hegel’s Aesthetics

    Concept/s: Hegel’s Aesthetics Conference Ljubljana 11-14 January 2018 Hosted by Aufhebung International Hegelian Association

    Rebecca Comay Dramaturgy of the Dialectic

    Abstract:

    The temptation is to pit the Aesthetics against the Phenomenology: the one provides a museum or mausoleum of dead artworks, the other presents an open-ended artistic experiment. The one examines art from Olympian heights of absolute knowing, the other mobilizes and transforms art from (almost) within: philosophy of art vs the art of philosophy—mention vs use, constative vs performative, Hegel’s Aesthetics vs Hegel’s aesthetics. This opposition in turn recalls the contrast between Aristotle’s Poetics and Plato’s dialogues: the former provides an anatomy of tragic poetry, the latter disarms tragedy by sublimating and absorbing its resources for philosophy. Things aren’t so simple, of course, but I’d like to understand why. I’ll be exploring the theatrical elements of Hegel’s Phenomenology. How does Hegel’s dramaturgical practice relate to this ambivalent praise of drama, at the end of the Aesthetics, as the “highest” - which means also the most self-overcoming or self-relativizing — of all the arts?

    ===
    Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x3BOaTPrbE&feature=youtu.be
    Downloaded by http://huffduff-video.snarfed.org/ on Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:23:43 GMT Available for 30 days after download

    download

    Tagged with education

    —Huffduffed by bengook

  2. Andrew Cole: The Philosophy of the Figure

    Concept/s: Hegel’s Aesthetics

    11 to 14 January 2018

    Museum of Modern Art, MG+, Cankarjeva 15, Ljubljana

     

    Hosted by: Aufhebung – International Hegelian Association

    Partners: MG+MSUM and University of Ljubljana

    Invitation and programme [PDF]

     

    Organizing committee: Mirt Komel, Bara Kolenc, Martin Hergouth, Ana Jovanović, Goran Vranešević

     

    Advisory board: Mladen Dolar (University of Ljubljana), Andrew Cole (Princeton University), Robert Pfaller (University of Art and Design Linz), Gregor Moder (Aufhebung), Sami Khatib (American University of Beirut), Zdenka Badovinac (MG+MSUM), Simon Kardum (Kino Šiška Centre for Urban Culture), Mara Ambrožič (John Moores University of Liverpool)

     

    The Concept/s conference is conceptually affiliated with the symposium What’s in a name? organised by Maska, Institute for Publishing, Artistic Production and Education, an accompanying event for the exhibition Janez Janša (curated by Domenico Quaranta and co-produced by MG+MSUM and Aksioma – Institute for Contemporary Art), to be held the 10 January 2018 at the Museum of Contemporary Art Metelkova.

     

     

    Hegel’s lectures on Aesthetics–perhaps the least explored work by the author of the Phenomenology of Spirit–is part of the vivid German tradition stretching from Lessing, Kant, Schiller, Goethe, to Nietzsche, Heidegger, Adorno, and others. Hegel’s philosophy of art encompasses a wide range of topics, from ancient architecture to modern theatre, from religious paintings to secular literature. However, the most interesting interventions by Hegel are not only those that were influenced or that themselves influenced the distinctive philosophical discipline of aesthetics, but also those that provided us with a very precise conceptual apparatus for our own contemporary debates on art. One prominent example is Hegel’s thesis that art became more and more philosophical in the course of its history according to the logical development of the idea(l) of beauty; a thesis that was the springboard for speculations about the end of art and that anticipated different debates regarding the status of conceptual artworks. All these themes are significant not only for contemporary art theories, but can, even more importantly, redefine the status of philosophy as such.

     

     

    Program

    Thursday, 11 January 2018

    6 p.m. | EXHIBITION | Atej Tutta, Bara Kolenc, Mirt Komel: Hegel’s Begriff | Auditorium MG+

     

    7 p.m. | LECTURE | Rebecca Comay: Dramaturgy of the Dialectic; chair: Mirt Komel

     

    Friday, 12 January 2018

    10 a.m. | REGISTRATION | Coffee

     

    11 a.m. | LECTURE | Mladen Dolar: The Endgame of Aesthetics: From Hegel to Beckett; chair: Bara Kolenc

     

    2 p.m. | PANEL 1 | (Post-)conceptual Art | Marko Jenko: A Hypothesis on Conceptual Art; Armin Schneider: The Original Word: (Dis)Appearing; Mara Ambrožič: Controversial Sustainability: Reflections on Post-conceptual Art, Engagement and Cultural Ecology; chair: Ana Jovanović

     

    4 p.m. | PANEL 2 | Art and Freedom | Anna Longo: Freedom, Reason, and Art: Fichte vs. Hegel; Stefan Hölscher: Hegel on Painting: Subjects Hiding behind Surfaces; Rok Benčin: Beggars of the Ideal: Ranciere’s Hegel; chair: Martin Hergouth

     

    7 p.m. | DISCUSSION | End of History, End of Art | Keti Chukrov: From the Truth of Art to its Infinite End; Sami Khatib: Aesthetics as Sensuous Supra-Sensuous Science: Hegel-Marx-Benjamin; chair: Peter Klepec

     

    Saturday, 13 January 2018

    11a.m. | LECTURE | Andrew Cole: The Philosophy of the Figure; chair: Gregor Moder

     

    2 p.m. | PANEL 3 | Art and Literature | Eva Ruda: The End of Art in the Novel; Libera Pisano: The Revolutionary Power of Poetry; Mirt Komel: Lacan Masthead Knot Touch ad Joyce; chair: Ana Jovanović

     

    4 p.m. | PANEL 4 | The Art of Comedy | Rachel Aumiller: Comic Abortions; Alfie Bown: Hegel the Comedian; Austin Gross: Vanishing Parabasis: Hegel’s Revised Account of Comedy; chair: Ana Jovanović

     

    7 p.m. | DISCUSSION | Alenka Zupančič: Objective Humour; Robert Pfaller: The Laughing, the Loving, and the Low Thing; chair: Gregor Moder

     

    Sunday, 14 January 2018

    2 p.m. | PANEL 5 | Art and Beauty | Florian Endres: Art and Second Nature; Martin Hergouth: Hegel, Beauty, and the Beast; Jošt Bartol: Sex, Art and Hegel: Searching for Ideal Beauty in Sexual Acts; chair: Mirt Komel

     

    4 p.m. | PANEL 6 | Art and Society | Samo Tomšič: The Work of Art; Ben Hjorth: Das Handelnde Geist: (What) Does Aufheben Perform?; Matt Ossias: Art Without Death or the Death of Art?; chair: Bara Kolenc

     

    7 p.m. | LECTURE | Frank Ruda: The Tact of the Absolute; chair: Goran Vraneševič

    http://www.mg-lj.si/en/events/1917/conference-concepts-hegels-aesthetics/

    —Huffduffed by bengook

  3. Philosophers Zone - 27 November 2010 - Hegel and Hegel’s God

    http://www.abc.net.au/rn/philosopherszone/stories/2010/3077690.htm This week, in another trek through the luxuriant and fascinating jungle that is the thought of one of the greatest philosophers of the nineteenth century, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, we turn to Hegel’s god and look at Hegel as a rational mystic.

    Our guest again is Robert M. Wallace, a philosopher best known for his book Hegel’s Philosophy of Reality, Freedom and God, and a man with a keen interest in philosophical mysticism.

    Liberal theologians during the last century and a half have wanted to articulate a conception of God that could satisfy people’s spiritual longings without conflicting with Darwinian evolution and other well-established scientific discoveries. Robert Wallace believes that Hegel had already done this

    —Huffduffed by theJBJshow

  4. Romanticism 15: Hegel

    A class taught by Tim Morton at UC Davis, May 11, 2012.

    —Huffduffed by transpondency

  5. Slavoj Zizek – Hegel in Athens: what would Hegel have said about our predicament? | Backdoor Broadcasting Company

    Event Date: 4 December 2015 Room B34 Birkbeck Main Building Birkbeck, University of London Malet Street London WC1E 7HX The Birkbeck Institute for the

    http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/12/slavoj-zizek-hegel-in-athens-what-would-hegel-have-said-about-our-predicament/

    —Huffduffed by sapolion

  6. Philosophers Zone - 20 November 2010 - The Mystery of Hegel

    His thought was hugely influential and hugely difficult. The philosopher Bertrand Russell once described him as the single most difficult philosopher to understand. He was Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Though he enjoyed relative fame during his lifetime, in the decades after his death in 1831, according to one writer, Hegel’s ideas were treated with "a mixture of contempt, horror and indifference."

    But something happened during the 20th century that brought Hegel back into sight for philosophers and thinkers. This week on The Philosopher’s Zone find out what that was. From http://www.abc.net.au/rn/philosopherszone/stories/2010/3071671.htm

    —Huffduffed by theJBJshow

  7. Slavoj Zizek “The Actuality of the Absolute: Hegel, Our Untimely Contemporary”

    Hegel is the ultimate bête noire of the last two centuries of philosophy:proponents of Lebensphilosophie, existentialists from Kierkegaard onwards, materialists, historicists, analytic philosophers and empiricists, Marxists, traditional liberals, religious moralists, deconstructionists and Deleuzians, they alldefine themselves through different modalities of rejecting Hegel. But when enemies start to speak the same language, it is a reliable sign that something is eluding them all. So what if something happens in Hegel, a break-through into a unique dimension of thought which was obliterated, rendered invisible, by the so-called post-metaphysical thought? What if the ridiculous image of Hegel as the absurd “absolute idealist” who “pretended to know everything” is an exemplary case of what Freud called Deck-Erinnerung (screen-memory), a fantasy-formation destined to cover up a traumatic truth? The task of the symposium will be to unearth aspects of this traumatic truth.

    —Huffduffed by jamesmnw

  8. Slavoj Zizek; The Limits of Hegel | Backdoor Broadcasting Company

    Event Date: 26 March 2011 – The Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities.

    Talk by Slavoj Zizek.

    While the global political and social situation is getting more and more explosive, emancipatory struggles are more and more hampered by ideological prejudices. This is why some ruthless clarifications are necessary.

    http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2011/03/slavoj-zizek-the-limits-of-hegel/

    —Huffduffed by theJBJshow

  9. PHILOSOPHY - G. W. F. Hegel

    The German philosopher Hegel believed that strange and alien bits of history have much to teach us. History and civilisation do not move in a straight line, so important ideas and attitudes get left behind. Through Hegel’s dense, unappealing prose, some brilliant ideas stand out. Please help us to make films by subscribing here: http://tinyurl.com/o28mut7 Brought to you by http://www.theschooloflife.com

    Produced in collaboration with http://www.madadam.co.uk

    ===
    Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5JGE3lhuNo&feature=youtu.be
    Downloaded by http://huffduff-video.snarfed.org/

    download

    Tagged with education

    —Huffduffed by nickreynolds

  10. Slavoj Zizek – What is reconciliation? Hegel against Schiller | Backdoor Broadcasting Company

    Event Date: 3 December 2015 Room B34 Birkbeck Main Building Birkbeck, University of London Malet Street London WC1E 7HX The Birkbeck Institute for the

    http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2015/12/slavoj-zizek-what-is-reconciliation-hegel-against-schiller/

    —Huffduffed by sapolion