I borrow 3 short clips from Rabbi Skobac for educational purposes from this url: https://youtu.be/VIoFKPA5lRg
I borrow from Tovia Singer's video on Isaiah 9:6 (Christian Bible) at this url: https://youtu.be/5hzbebIapuU
See also his Tovia Singer's video dedicated to the corruptions of Isaiah 9:6 at https://youtu.be/B1JTb7qGwgI
Trinitarians after Nicea saw Isaiah 9:6, and if you read the child in Isaiah 9:6 is in the future after Isaiah's time, and is named "Mighty God," and "Prince of Peace," this could be Jesus. You would just have to ignore this also said the same person was named the ETERNAL FATHER. So you would suggest it really was Jesus, God-the-son who was the child born, and hope the reader would not notice the incongruity, This means that if this name meant this was the BEING at issue, then Jesus would be the FATHER, not the Son. This verse thus if it truly applied destroyed the Trinity because Jesus would no longer be god-the-Son but god-the-Father.
This was never endorsed in any of the gospels or epistles in NT.
Over time, imagination took over, and the verb tenses in target languages like English changed the Hebrew from a child "was" born to "will be born," and he "was named…." to "will be named," etc — In fact, in Isaiah 9:6, four different past tenses are changed to future ten…
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LF1EyQBNJXY
Downloaded by http://huffduff-video.snarfed.org/ on Fri Dec 2 00:03:32 2022
Available for 30 days after download