RS26 - Is Anthropology Still a Science?

Rationally Speaking | Official Podcast of New York City Skeptics

Release date: January 16, 2011

In a recent article in the New York Times (13 Dec 2010 http://nyti.ms/gTiRK6), Nicholas Wade reported that the American Anthropological Association had decided “to strip the word ‘science’ from a statement of its long-range plan.” Is this just a reflection of the long standing division between physical and cultural anthropology or is there more here? The revised statement says that “the purposes of the association shall be to advance public understanding of humankind in all its aspects,” a wording that opens the possibility for cultural anthropologists to engage in public advocacy on behalf of cultures they are studying. So, what kind of discipline is anthropology, after all? And, more broadly, should scientists cross the line from research into public advocacy?

http://www.rationallyspeakingpodcast.org/show/rs26-is-anthropology-still-a-science.html

Possibly related…

  1. Anthropology: Science or Humanity ?

    The American Anthropological Association has stirred controversy by removing the word "science" from its long-term mission statement. Peter Peregrine, president of the Society for Anthropological Sciences, and Hugh Gusterson, executive boardmember of the American Antrhopological Association, discuss the decision, which has highlighted divisions between science-oriented anthropologists and those more focused on the humanities.

    —Huffduffed by gtyrelle 2 years ago

  2. Should Science Debate Pseudoscience?

    Today I’m going to propose a bit of a radical idea. About every week I get invited to debate someone — on another podcast, on the radio, in person — and I’m invited to take the side of science and debate a pseudoscientist. It might be a ghost hunter, it might be a Young Earth Creationist, it might be a practitioner of alternative medicine, always based on some Skeptoid episode I’ve done that ruffled someone’s feathers. Although I used to always accept these invitations, I now always decline them. I have concluded that it is not only useless for science to debate pseudoscience, it is actually counterproductive to science. Today I’m going to argue that no scientist should ever agree to debate a pseudoscientist about a scientific question.

    —Huffduffed by norelpref 3 years ago

  3. What does the anthropology of Japan tell us about Japan - and about anthropology?

    An excursion into the history of Japanese studies with William Kelly (Yale)

    http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/what-does-anthropology-japan-tell-us-about-japan-and-about-anthropology-audio

    —Huffduffed by Zatoichi 2 weeks ago